Something is running all night
The lowest-consumption month still drew 935 kWh a day. Carried across the year that is 341,000 of 420,000 kWh consumed as baseload — in a building occupied 60 hours a week.
SimEffi turns your utility bills and building data into ranked efficiency opportunities, incentive-adjusted economics and a capital roadmap — so you know what deserves your capital before you commit it.
Illustrative figures for a hypothetical building. Your numbers come from your own bills.
Set your building, then choose how far you are willing to go. The diagram shows where the energy goes today and how much of it a given strategy actually removes.
$91,800 a year
The energy-flow diagram needs JavaScript. The figures below still reflect the selected strategy.
Utility intake → end use → what the strategy removes
Orientation only — not an engineering estimate. End-use splits are type-level averages and incentives are unconfirmed. A full assessment replaces every assumption here with your actual consumption profile, equipment condition and program eligibility.
Five steps that take a building from a pile of utility bills to a capital plan someone can actually approve.
Screen the building's data for what is actually costing money — not a generic retrofit list.
Put cost, savings, payback and confidence against every measure worth considering.
Rank the opportunities so the first dollar goes where the gap is widest.
Match measures to current programs and flag the timing that protects the funding.
Move forward knowing what can be done now and what needs professional validation.
Three examples of questions an assessment can help you investigate using utility data and building information.
The lowest-consumption month still drew 935 kWh a day. Carried across the year that is 341,000 of 420,000 kWh consumed as baseload — in a building occupied 60 hours a week.
$19,500 of work — $13,125 after incentives — returning about $10,400 a year. No capital approval cycle, no procurement, no equipment.
Sizing rooftop units against an uncorrected load is how owners buy 15–25% more capacity than they need. We moved that spend to year three, after the load is fixed.
Packaged rooftop units running outside occupied hours are the single most common finding in a small commercial office — and the cheapest one to fix. No procurement, no capital approval, no equipment.
The same units are usually the largest line on the capital plan. Getting the order right between those two facts is most of what an assessment is for.
What an assessment coversRooftop packaged units at end of service life — the $180,000 line in the illustrative example, deferred for later planning.
A report written for the person who has to defend the spend. Every number traces back to a bill or a stated assumption — including the ones that argue against spending money.
For each recommended measure, SimEffi screens current government and utility programs, explains why the measure may fit, flags critical timing requirements and links you to the official program page.
Program appears relevant based on measure type and building characteristics. Eligibility is not yet confirmed.
More project or building information is required before a pathway can be assessed.
Used only after eligibility has actually been verified with the program administrator.
We analyze real building data to uncover what actually matters — not what is easiest to sell.
We quantify costs, savings, paybacks and incentives so you can decide with confidence.
We help you focus on the right opportunities in the right order, sized to a real budget.
We screen available programs and show you how to access funding before you commit.
Clear, practical and executive-ready — so you can act, not just collect data.
Provide the information you already have about your building and energy use.
We evaluate potential efficiency and capital opportunities and review the findings.
See where to invest first, what can wait and what may qualify for incentives.
No, and we are careful about the distinction. This is a preliminary opportunity screen — it tells you what to investigate first and roughly what the economics look like. It is not an ASHRAE Level I, II or III audit and it is not stamped by a professional engineer. For most owners it is the step that decides whether a full audit is worth commissioning, and on which building.
Your recent utility bills and basic information about the building, how it operates and any planned capital work. A utility portal export is ideal. More detailed data makes the results sharper, but it is not required to start.
No. We do not sell equipment, we do not take referral fees from contractors, and we are not a controls vendor with an analysis product attached. That is the point — when a report says to skip window replacement, nobody lost a sale over it.
They are planning estimates, shown as ranges rather than a single confident figure, with confidence stated for each opportunity. Opportunities that need more information are flagged for validation rather than recommended outright.
Then that is the report. Some buildings are already well run, and some measures do not pencil out at any building. An assessment can recommend against a measure outright, or defer it until it is validated. A screen that never says no is not a screen.
We estimate them and tell you what has to be true. Rates and rules change within a fiscal year, and most electricity-side programs require pre-approval before you purchase equipment or sign a contract — the most common way owners lose funding. We flag the sequencing and link the official program page; you or your contractor file the application.
Find out which building improvement deserves your capital first — and which one can wait.