Where is the biggest opportunity?
Compare buildings on one consistent score, so a 43 in one building means the same as a 43 in another.
SimEffi Portfolio
Prioritize buildings, not just projects.
When capital is limited the question becomes which property deserves attention first. SimEffi Portfolio compares opportunity across assets on one consistent basis.
Buildings12Illustrative portfolio
Annual energy spend$2.42MAcross all assets
Identified opportunity$417KPer year
Potential incentives$630KScreened, unconfirmed
Ranked by where the gap is widest
| Building | Type | Size | SimEffi Score™ | Opportunity | Potential savings | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King St. Offices | Office | 42,000 sf | 85 | Priority | $126,500 | Act first |
| Maple Logistics | Warehouse | 210,000 sf | 71 | High | $84,600 | Investigate |
| Riverside Centre | Retail | 85,000 sf | 61 | Medium | $37,200 | Plan |
| Commerce Tower | Office | 120,000 sf | 43 | Low | $16,400 | Monitor |
Illustrative portfolio only. A higher score means a higher priority — King St. gets the budget first.
What it answers
Portfolio questions SimEffi is designed to answer
What fits this year's capital budget?
Compare quick wins against planned replacements and larger modernization projects, then sequence them against the money actually available.
What can be bundled?
Identify common projects across multiple buildings to improve procurement, contractor scheduling and implementation planning.
Why one rubric matters
Stop spreading the budget evenly.
Most portfolios allocate efficiency capital by whoever asked loudest or whichever building last had a comfort complaint. Scoring every asset the same way turns that into a defensible sequence you can put in front of ownership.
One comparable score per asset
Every asset is assessed the same way, so the comparison is fair.
Capital planning across years
Sequence projects against a real annual budget rather than approving them one at a time.
Incentive timing across the portfolio
Program windows and pre-approval deadlines tracked per project, so funding is not lost to a purchase made too early.
Reading the table
Commerce Tower scores 43 and shows the smallest opportunity. It is the best-run building in the portfolio — and the worst place to spend the next dollar.
King St. Offices scores 85 against a $126,500 annual opportunity: no central automation, partial LED, rooftop units at end of service life.
The gap between them is the entire argument for portfolio scoring. Both buildings would have looked equally deserving on a project-by-project request.
See how a single building is scoredMore than one building? Start with the worst one.
Tell us how many assets you manage and we will scope a portfolio screen.